Undependable data, undependable rankings
A couple of weeks back, theTimes Greater Educationpublished a ranking of leading attractors of industry funds. Its actually just a re-packaging of data from its major fall rankings work out market dollars per professors is one of its thirteen signs and this is simply that sign released as a standalone ranking. Whats interesting is how at probabilities the results are with released information offered from institutions themselves.
Take Ludwig-Maximillans University in Munich, the leading university for research study earnings according to THE. According to the ranking, the university collects a stonking $392,800 in industry income per academic. However a quick appearancea peek at the universitys own realities and figures page reveals a different story. The organization says it gets euro; 148.4 million in outdoors funding. But over 80% of that is from the EU, the German government or a German federal government agency. Only euro; 26.7 million originates from other sources. This is at a university which has 1492 professors. I make that out to be 17,895 euros per prof. Unless the THE gets a much different $/ euro; rate than I do, thats a long method from $392,800 per teacher. In truth, the only way the THE number makes sense is if you count thewholeuniversity spending plan as external funding (1492 profs time $392,800 equals roughly $600M, which is quite near the euro; 579 million figure which the university asserts as its whole budget).
Or take Duke, second on the THE list. According to the rankings, the university picks up $287,100 in market income per faculty member. Dukes Facts and Figures pagesays Duke has 3,428 academic personnel. Multiply that out and you get a shade over $984 million. But Dukes financial statementsindicate that the total quantity of grants, contracting and comparable agreements from non-government sources is simply under $540 million, which would pertain to $157,000 per prof, or only 54% of exactly what the Times spokens it is.
The 3rdplace school, the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Innovation (KAIST), is tough to analyze because it seems not to publish financial statements or have a realities amp; figures page in English. However, presuming Wikipedias quote of 1140 academic personnel is correct, and we kindly translate the graph on the universitys research study statistics page as telling us that 50 of the 279 billion Won in total research study expenditures comes from industry, then at current currency exchange rate that comes to a shade over $42 million, or $37,000 per academic. Or, one-seventh of what the THE says it is.
I cant analyze the fourth-placed organization, due to the fact that Johns Hopkins financial statements don’t break out its grant financing by public/private. But tied for 5th place is my absolute preferred Anadolou University in Turkey which supposedly has $242,500 in income per professor. This is challenging to examine because Turkish universitiesdonot release their financialstatements (in English at least). However I can tell you right now thatthis figureis fantasy. On its truths and figures page, the university asserts to have 2,537 scholastic staff (if you believe thats a lot, remember Anadolus claim to popularity is as a distance ed university it has actually 2.7 million signed up students in addition to the 30,000 or so it has on its physical campus, roughly half of whom are active). For both numbers to be real, Anadolu would have to be pulling in $615 million/year in private funding, and that just strains credulity. Definitely, Anadoluhasquite a little bit of businessincome a University World News post from 2008 recommends that it was drawing in $176 million per yearfrom personal sources(impressive, but less than a 3rd of exactly what is indicated by the THE numbers), but much of that appears to come from exactly what we would typically call secondary business – that is, companies owned by the university – rather than external financial investment from the personaleconomic sector.
I might go through the remainder of the leading ten, but you get the pictureunderstand. If just a couple of hours of googling on my part can toss up concerns like this, then you have to question how bad the remainder of the data is. In truth, the only university in the top ten where the THE number might be something near legit is that for Wageningen University in the Netherlands. This university lists euro; 101.7 million in contract research study, and has 587 teachers. That comes out to a shade over euro; 173,000 or about $195,000 per professor which is at least spitting range from the $242,000 claimed by THE. The issue is, its unclear from any Wageningen paperwork Ive had the ability to find just how much of that agreement research is in fact private sector. So it might be close to precise, or it may be totally off.